MyAffiliates vs Income Access
Updated May 2026
Overall winner: MyAffiliates · 1.3-point lead
Category wins
2 – 4
At a glance
Quick comparison
Every weighted category, side-by-side. Bars show category-level percentage; the overall row is the weighted total out of 100.
| Category |  MyAffiliates |  Income Access | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 Technology & Real-Time Capabilities · 24% | | | Income Access |
| C2 iGaming-Specific Programme Management · 18% | | | MyAffiliates |
| C3 Platform UX & Operational Efficiency · 13% | | | MyAffiliates |
| C4 Fraud Detection, Risk & Security · 10% | | | MyAffiliates |
| C5 Integrations & Ecosystem Fit · 7% | | | Income Access |
| C6 Onboarding, Documentation & Support · 6% | | | Income Access |
| C7 Scalability, Performance & Reliability · 7% | | | Income Access |
| C8 Pricing Transparency & Value · 5% | | | MyAffiliates |
| C9 Market Presence · 2% | | | Income Access |
| C10 Customisability & Platform Flexibility · 8% | | | Tie |
| Overall score | | | Winner: MyAffiliates |
The case for each
Opening analysis
MyAffiliates versus Income Access is a close legacy iGaming comparison. MyAffiliates scores slightly higher overall because it performs better on iGaming programme management, UX, fraud/security, and pricing. Income Access wins categories tied to scale, onboarding, technology, and market proof. Operators choosing between the two should focus less on headline reputation and more on which workflow fits their affiliate team: customisable platform control or service-led incumbent support.
Category breakdown
Head-to-head, category by category
Technology and real-time capabilities
MyAffiliates
Income Access
Gap: 4 pts in favour of Income Access
Income Access scored 80% in Technology versus 76% for MyAffiliates. That gives Income Access a small category lead, mainly due to broader platform and infrastructure confidence. MyAffiliates is capable, but public API and modern architecture evidence is weaker. Winner: Income Access.
iGaming-specific programme management
MyAffiliates
Income Access
Gap: 8 pts in favour of MyAffiliates
MyAffiliates scored 92% in iGaming programme management compared with 84% for Income Access. This reflects strong iGaming-native customisation, multi-brand support, and commission handling. Income Access is also iGaming-native, but the scoring favours MyAffiliates on product-specific programme depth. Winner: MyAffiliates.
Platform UX and operational efficiency
MyAffiliates
Income Access
Gap: 4 pts in favour of MyAffiliates
MyAffiliates led 72% to 68% on UX/Ops. Neither platform scores like the newer tools, and both should be demoed for everyday tasks. MyAffiliates gets the edge because the platform workflow and customisation evidence is slightly stronger. Winner: MyAffiliates.
Onboarding, documentation, and support
MyAffiliates
Income Access
Gap: 8 pts in favour of Income Access
Income Access scored 84% against 76% for MyAffiliates in Onboarding. This is where Income Access's managed-services background helps. Operators that want more support around programme operations may see real value here. Winner: Income Access.
Scale and reliability
MyAffiliates
Income Access
Gap: 4 pts in favour of Income Access
Income Access scored 96% in Scale/Reliability while MyAffiliates scored 92%. Both have credible long-term use in iGaming. Income Access wins by a small margin because of its market longevity and corporate backing. Winner: Income Access.
Market presence and proof
MyAffiliates
Income Access
Gap: 4 pts in favour of Income Access
Income Access scored 96% in Market presence compared with 92% for MyAffiliates. Both are well-known names, but Income Access has slightly stronger legacy market penetration in the scoring model. The difference is not decisive on its own. Winner: Income Access.
What really sets them apart
Key differences
- 1
MyAffiliates has the stronger iGaming programme score.
- 2
Income Access is stronger on scale, onboarding, and market presence.
- 3
Both have legacy UX concerns compared with newer platforms.
- 4
The winner depends on whether platform control or service-led support matters more.
Choose your fit
Who should choose which?
Choose
MyAffiliates if…
- you want stronger iGaming-specific configuration and affiliate platform control.
- custom commission setups and multi-brand workflows are more important than managed-services support.
Choose
Income Access if…
- you prefer an incumbent provider with strong market proof and support history.
- your team wants more service-led assistance around setup and affiliate operations.
Final call
Verdict
MyAffiliates wins narrowly in the scoring model because it is stronger on iGaming-specific programme management and slightly better on operational workflow. Income Access is the safer choice for buyers who place heavier weight on market reach, scale, and service history. The score gap is small, so this should be a demo-led decision. MyAffiliates is the better product-led pick; Income Access is the stronger incumbent-support pick.
Keep comparing
Related comparisons
Cellxpert This comparison is for operators weighing a modern iGaming-native platform against one of the oldest names in affiliate software. Cellxpert scores higher overall because its technology, player visibility, and operational workflows map closely to current casino and sportsbook needs. Income Access remains relevant because of its Paysafe ownership, long market presence, managed-services history, and operator footprint. The choice is less about whether Income Access is credible and more about whether a team wants a newer product workflow or a long-established provider with legacy scale.
Cellxpert Cellxpert versus MyAffiliates is a direct iGaming-native matchup. Both platforms understand casino and sportsbook affiliate programmes, commission rules, multi-brand operations, and affiliate manager workflows. MyAffiliates brings age, client familiarity, and customisation depth. Cellxpert wins the scoring model by pairing iGaming-native functionality with stronger technology, UX, integrations, and operational speed, while still acknowledging that MyAffiliates has more legacy market proof.
Income Access 
Income Access and NetRefer are both legacy iGaming names, so this comparison is usually about confidence, migration risk, and the type of support an operator wants. Income Access has deep market presence and Paysafe ownership. NetRefer scores higher overall because the product evidence is stronger across iGaming capability, fraud/security, technology, and UX. Neither is a lightweight choice; both are more relevant to established operators than small programmes looking for a quick setup.
Affilka by SOFTSWISS Affilka and MyAffiliates are both iGaming-native platforms, but they appeal to different buying instincts. MyAffiliates has a longer operating history and stronger public market proof. Affilka has a more modern profile, clear SOFTSWISS connection, and good fit for casino and sportsbook operators that want a pure iGaming platform. The scores are close, so the comparison should focus on whether the buyer values market maturity or a newer product environment.