Affilka by SOFTSWISS vs MyAffiliates
Updated May 2026
Overall winner: MyAffiliates · 0.2-point lead
Category wins
2 – 3
(1 tie)
At a glance
Quick comparison
Every weighted category, side-by-side. Bars show category-level percentage; the overall row is the weighted total out of 100.
The case for each
Opening analysis
Affilka and MyAffiliates are both iGaming-native platforms, but they appeal to different buying instincts. MyAffiliates has a longer operating history and stronger public market proof. Affilka has a more modern profile, clear SOFTSWISS connection, and good fit for casino and sportsbook operators that want a pure iGaming platform. The scores are close, so the comparison should focus on whether the buyer values market maturity or a newer product environment.
Category breakdown
Head-to-head, category by category
Technology and real-time capabilities
Affilka by SOFTSWISS
MyAffiliates
Both platforms scored 76% in Technology. Affilka has public real-time statistics, but the 15-minute update cadence keeps it below the highest-scoring platforms. MyAffiliates has long-running product capability, but public modern API and real-time detail is limited. Winner: Tie.
iGaming-specific programme management
Affilka by SOFTSWISS
MyAffiliates
Gap: 4 pts in favour of MyAffiliates
MyAffiliates scored 92% in iGaming programme management versus 88% for Affilka. Both support core operator needs such as multi-brand management, player tracking, and commission models. MyAffiliates gets the edge because its long focus on gaming affiliate operations supports a slightly higher category score. Winner: MyAffiliates.
Platform UX and operational efficiency
Affilka by SOFTSWISS
MyAffiliates
Gap: 8 pts in favour of Affilka by SOFTSWISS
Affilka scored 80% in UX/Ops compared with 72% for MyAffiliates. This is where Affilka feels more current in the scoring model. MyAffiliates remains functional, but its legacy profile creates more usability risk. Winner: Affilka.
Integrations and ecosystem fit
Affilka by SOFTSWISS
MyAffiliates
Gap: 4 pts in favour of Affilka by SOFTSWISS
Affilka scored 72% on Integrations versus 68% for MyAffiliates. The gap is small and both have some public API transparency limits. Affilka edges ahead because its API/export story is clearer, even if some documentation appears gated. Winner: Affilka.
Scale and reliability
Affilka by SOFTSWISS
MyAffiliates
Gap: 12 pts in favour of MyAffiliates
MyAffiliates scored 92% in Scale/Reliability against Affilka at 80%. Its longer market use and established operator base give it a clear advantage. Affilka has credible SOFTSWISS-backed scale, but the scoring still favours the older platform here. Winner: MyAffiliates.
Market presence and proof
Affilka by SOFTSWISS
MyAffiliates
Gap: 12 pts in favour of MyAffiliates
MyAffiliates scored 92% in Market presence compared with Affilka at 80%. Affilka has visible momentum and strong parent-company relevance, but MyAffiliates has deeper independent recognition as an affiliate platform. That market maturity is the main reason it wins overall. Winner: MyAffiliates.
What really sets them apart
Key differences
- 1
Affilka has the stronger UX/Ops score and a more modern product feel.
- 2
MyAffiliates has stronger scale and market proof.
- 3
Both are credible on iGaming-specific programme management.
- 4
Affilka's public documentation and security proof still leave review questions.
Choose your fit
Who should choose which?
Choose
Affilka by SOFTSWISS if…
- you want a pure iGaming platform connected to the SOFTSWISS ecosystem.
- a more current admin experience matters more than the longest public market record.
Choose
MyAffiliates if…
- you want a mature iGaming affiliate platform with stronger legacy proof.
- market familiarity and long-term operator use are major buying factors.
Final call
Verdict
MyAffiliates wins by a narrow score margin because it has stronger market, scale, and iGaming programme evidence. Affilka is not far behind and may be the better choice for operators already aligned with SOFTSWISS or looking for a newer interface. The decision should be based on demo quality and integration requirements. MyAffiliates is the safer legacy pick; Affilka is the more modern ecosystem pick.
Keep comparing
Related comparisons
Cellxpert versus MyAffiliates is a direct iGaming-native matchup. Both platforms understand casino and sportsbook affiliate programmes, commission rules, multi-brand operations, and affiliate manager workflows. MyAffiliates brings age, client familiarity, and customisation depth. Cellxpert wins the scoring model by pairing iGaming-native functionality with stronger technology, UX, integrations, and operational speed, while still acknowledging that MyAffiliates has more legacy market proof.
This is a comparison between two iGaming-native products, but they have different buyer profiles. Cellxpert ranks higher because it scores better across technology, data granularity, integrations, fraud controls, and pricing clarity. Affilka by SOFTSWISS is a strong fit for operators that want a pure casino and sportsbook affiliate system, especially where the SOFTSWISS ecosystem is relevant. The deciding questions are refresh speed, API transparency, and how much the buyer values ecosystem alignment versus platform flexibility.
MyAffiliates versus Income Access is a close legacy iGaming comparison. MyAffiliates scores slightly higher overall because it performs better on iGaming programme management, UX, fraud/security, and pricing. Income Access wins categories tied to scale, onboarding, technology, and market proof. Operators choosing between the two should focus less on headline reputation and more on which workflow fits their affiliate team: customisable platform control or service-led incumbent support.

